logo

Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Revue Communauté-Santé et Sciences Infirmières

Satisfaction and Loyalty of Type 2 Diabetic Patients in the City of Kinshasa in the Democratic Republic of Congo: E ect of the Patient-as-Care-Partner Model

Submitted
January 2, 2026
Published
December 25, 2024

Abstract

Introduction : This study evaluates the satisfaction and retention of type 2 diabetic
(T2D) patients in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo, through the Patient Partner
in Care model. This model aims to improve the healthcare system by focusing e orts on
collaboration, education, and communication.
Method : We conducted a qualitative study with a descriptive phenomenological ap
proach, including semi-structured interviews with 15 patients recruited at the Elimo-Santu
Health Center. Data analysis was based on a thematic approach through triangulation,
facilitating the identi cation of themes and categories.
Results : The results show overall patient satisfaction, attributed to the quality of care,
advice, and personalized support, reinforced by a computerized appointment system. In
terprofessional collaboration among doctors, nurses, and laboratory technicians was consi
dered crucial, promoting a better understanding of the disease and improved adherence
to appointments. However, dissatisfaction was noted regarding the quality of medications,
waiting times, and insu cient state coverage of care.
Discussion : The integration of the Patient Partner strategy into multidisciplinary work
is a lever to strengthen the quality of primary care and retention of T2D patients in Kin
shasa, with recommendations to improve appointment systems and waiting conditions.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. (1999). Diagnostic et classification du
  2. diabète sucré : les nouveaux critères. Diabetes & Metabolism, 25(1), 72-83.
  3. Bachimont, J., Cogneau, J., &Cogneau, A. (2006). Pourquoi les médecins généralistes n'observent-ils
  4. pas les recommandations de bonnes pratiques cliniques? L'exemple du diabète de type 2. Sciences sociales
  5. et santé, 24, 75-103.
  6. Belkebir, H. (2023). Pro l épidémiologique, nutritionnel et biologique des diabétiques de la wilaya de Mascara
  7. [Thèse]. Université de Mascara. http:/ /dspace.univ- mascara.dz:8080/jspui/handle/123456789/908
  8. Bourmaud, A., Piot de Villars, E., & Renault-Teissier, E. (2022). Patient partenaire et éducation thérapeutique en cancérologie. Bulletin du
  9. Cancer, 109(5), 588-597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bulcan.2021.09.016
  10. Demoncy, A. (2016). La recherche qualitative : Introduction à la méthodologie de l'entretien. Kinésithérapie, la Re
  11. vue, 16(180), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kine.2016.07.004
  12. Drapeau, M. (2004). Les critères de scientificité en recherche qualitative. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prps.2004.01.004
  13. Fortin, M.-F., & Gagnon, J. (2016).
  14. Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche : Méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives. Chenelière Éducation.
  15. https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/35682
  16. Gning, S. B., Thiam, M., Fall, F., Ba-Fall, K., Mbaye, P. S., & Fourcade, L. (2007). Le diabète sucré en Afrique subsaharienne : as
  17. pects épidémiologiques, di cultés de prise en charge. Médecine Tropicale, 67, 607-611.
  18. Guillausseau, P.-J., & Laloi-Michelin, M. (2003). Physiopathologie du dia
  19. bète de type 2. La Revue de Médecine
  20. Interne, 24(11), 730-737. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0248-8663(03)00244-3
  21. Hirpa, D., Bekela, T., & Abdissa, D. (2023). Prevalence of diabetic
  22. foot ulcer and its associated factors among diabetes patients on follow up at public hospitals in West
  23. Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Africa Nursing
  24. Sciences, 19, 100578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2023.100578
  25. Kaldheim, H. K. A., Fossum, M., Munday, J., Johnsen, K. M. F., &
  26. Slettebø, Å. (2021). A qualitative study of perioperative nursing students' experiences of interprofessional
  27. simulation-based learning. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 30(1-2), 174-187.
  28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15535
  29. Kilminster, S., Cottrell, D., Grant,J., & Jolly, B. (2007). AMEE Guide
  30. No. 27 : E ective educational and clinical supervision. Medical Teacher,
  31. 29(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590701210907
  32. Krief, N., & Zardet, V. (2013). Analyse de données qualitatives et recherche
  33. intervention.
  34. Lambert, H., & Kahindo, J.-B. M. (2022).
  35. Accès aux soins et prise en charge des
  36. personnes diabétiques en République
  37. démocratique du Congo. Santé Pu
  38. blique, 34(1), 61-70. https://doi.org/
  39. 10.3917/spub.221.0061
  40. Masamba, N. L. (2021). Autogestion du
  41. diabète de type 2 : In uence des
  42. connaissances et des caractéristiques
  43. socioculturelles des patients dèles des
  44. églises dites prophétiques à Kinshasa
  45. (République Démocratique du Congo)
  46. [Mémoire]. Université de Montréal.
  47. https : / / umontreal . scholaris . ca /
  48. items / 20fceba3- 833d- 47aa- 970d
  49. 424c1e71c8e7
  50. Mwana-Wabene, A. C., Lwamushi,
  51. S. M., Eboma, C. M., Lyabayungu,
  52. P. M.-B., Cheruga, B., Karemere,
  53. H., Mwembo, A. T., Balaluka,
  54. G. B., & Mukalenge, F. C. (2022).
  55. Choix thérapeutiques des hyperten
  56. dus et diabétiques en milieu rural :
  57. Une étude mixte dans deux zones de
  58. santé de l'Est de la République Dé
  59. mocratique du Congo. African Jour
  60. nal of Primary Health Care & Family
  61. Medicine, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.
  62. 4102/phcfm.v14i1.3004
  63. Prevolnik Rupel, V., Divjak, M., &
  64. Turk, E. (2021). Changes in the le
  65. vel of knowledge of diabetes among
  66. elderly with diabetes in Slovenia in
  67. the period 20112020. Primary Care
  68. Diabetes, 15(5), 879-883. https://doi.
  69. org/10.1016/j.pcd.2021.07.001
  70. Rondeau, K., Paillé, P., & Bédard, É.
  71. (2023). La confection d'un guide d'en
  72. tretien pas à pas dans l'enquête quali
  73. tative. Recherches qualitatives, 42(1),
  74. 5-29. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 7202 /
  75. 1100242ar
  76. Rorive, M., Letiexhe, M. R., Scheen,
  77. A. J., & Ziegler, O. (2005). Obésité
  78. et diabète de type 2, 374-382.
  79. Saeedi, P., Petersohn, I., Salpea,
  80. P., Malanda, B., Karuranga,
  81. S., Unwin, N., Colagiuri, S.,
  82. Guariguata, L., Motala, A. A.,
  83. Ogurtsova, K., Shaw, J. E.,
  84. Bright, D., Williams, R., & IDF
  85. Diabetes Atlas Committee.
  86. (2019). Global and regional diabetes
  87. prevalence estimates for 2019 and pro
  88. jections for 2030 and 2045 : Results
  89. from the International Diabetes Fe
  90. deration Diabetes Atlas, 9th edition.
  91. Diabetes Research and Clinical Prac
  92. tice, 157, 107843. https://doi.org/10.
  93. 1016/j.diabres.2019.107843
  94. Scheen, A. J. (2007). Le glucagon-like
  95. peptide-1 (GLP-1), nouvelle cible
  96. dans le traitement du diabète de type
  97. 2, 216-219.
  98. Te Velde, A. A., Verstege, M. I., &
  99. Hommes, D. W. (2006). Critical ap
  100. praisal of the current practice in mu
  101. rine TNBS-induced colitis. In amma
  102. tory Bowel Diseases, 12(10), 995-999.
  103. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mib.
  104. 0000227817.54969.5e

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)